MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2124551261 · doi:10.1586/ecp.10.16

Strategies for the real-time detection of Ca<sup>2+</sup>channel events of single cells: recent advances and new possibilities

2010· article· en· W2124551261 on OpenAlexafffund
Xiujun Li, Paul CH Li

Bibliographic record

VenueExpert Review of Clinical Pharmacology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience and Neural Engineering
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ca(2+) ion channels play key roles in cell physiology and they are important drug targets. The Ca(2+) channel events are mainly measurable by fluorescent and patch clamp methods. This review summarizes the recent advances of these techniques for the detection of Ca(2+) channel events and the prospect of their new directions in the near future. Conventional bulk fluorescent methods are amenable to high-throughput applications, but they are not real-time single-cell measurements, which provide kinetic data on individual cells and offer unparalleled sensitive data for rare cells. Recent advances on real-time single-cell fluorescent measurements are conducted on microfluidic chips with scalable cell-retention sites, integrated with electrical stimulation and fluorescent measuring features. Patch clamp techniques are real-time measurements conducted on single cells, but the measurements are of low throughput. Recent advances are conducted on microfluidic patch clamp chips for high-throughput applications. Future real-time single-cell Ca(2+) channel event measurements will be conducted in a multiparametric manner in an integrated and automated microfluidic chip.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.096
GPT teacher head0.435
Teacher spread0.338 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExpert Review of Clinical PharmacologySame topicNeuroscience and Neural EngineeringFrench-language works237,207