MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2124555274 · doi:10.1109/iembs.1997.756835

EM radiation behavior upon biological tissues in a radio-frequency power transfer link for a cortical visual implant

2002· article· en· W2124555274 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWireless Body Area Networks
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAttenuationAntenna (radio)AcousticsRadio frequencyMaximum power transfer theoremElectric fieldElectromagnetic fieldComputer sciencePhysicsRadiationElectromagnetic radiationOpticsPower (physics)Telecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a method to evaluate the interactions between a radio-frequency power transfer link and biological tissues. First the authors analyze the propagation of a plane wave model at the skin interface to evaluate the frequency that optimize the transfer ratio. They then use the Finite-Difference Time-Domain method to calculate the exact electromagnetic fields propagation in a discrete 3D space and time for a box brain model with an inductive emitting antenna. The results exhibit the electric field pattern in the antenna axis plane and in the back of the head. They show for an optimized frequency carrier (20 MHz) that the attenuation of electric field strength is 15 dB and that most of the energy is reflected at the air-tissue interface.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.833
Threshold uncertainty score0.697

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations79
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWireless Body Area NetworksFrench-language works237,207