Rab5 regulates the kiss and run fusion between phagosomes and endosomes and the acquisition of phagosome leishmanicidal properties in RAW 264.7 macrophages
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Phagolysosome biogenesis is essential for the killing and degradation of intracellular pathogens. It involves the fusion of phagosomes with various endocytic organelles, a process known to be regulated in part by Rab proteins. We generated RAW 264.7 macrophages expressing an active mutant of Rab5 (Rab5(Q79L)) to determine the role of Rab5 in phagocytosis and phagolysosome biogenesis. Our results indicate that Rab5 stimulates phagocytosis of latex beads but not Fc or C3 receptor-mediated phagocytosis. Rab5 also acts to restrict the complete fusion of phagosomes with endosomes, a phenomenon allowing exchange of solutes from the two compartments without complete intermixing of their membrane (kiss and run). In Rab5(Q79L)-expressing macrophages, uncontrolled fusion events occurred, leading to the appearance of giant phagosomes. These phagosomes could initiate their maturation and acquire LAMP1, but failed to generate the microbicidal conditions needed to kill intracellular parasites. These results identify Rab5 as a key molecule regulating phagosome-endosome fusion and as an essential component in the innate ability of macrophages to restrict the growth of intracellular parasites.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it