Les dynamiques du pouvoir entre violence et justice : réflexions de théologie pratique
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article présente un modèle psychosocial dynamique des relations depouvoir, à partir d’éléments structuraux et stratégiques. Ces élémentsstructuraux consistent en des positions et des moyens de pouvoir. Quantaux éléments stratégiques, ils sont de l’ordre de l’exercice et des motifs dupouvoir. Ce sont ces éléments qui constituent la dynamique des échanges depouvoir dans une relation entre des personnes considérées dans le contextesocial général. Le modèle permet de comprendre la relation de pouvoir dansdes situations de violence, dans un contexte d’intervention, et dans le jeu desrelations de pouvoir avec dieu. La justice et l’« empowerment » servent icid’instances critiques et normatives dans une recherche d’approchesreligieuses et théologiques plus salutaires par rapport au pouvoir et àl’intervention.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".