MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2124624749 · doi:10.14257/ijca.2014.7.11.05

Programming in MikroBasic for Automation in Pattern Based Manufacturing

2014· article· en· W2124624749 on OpenAlexafffund
Punit Anand, Anand M. Sharan

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Control and Automation · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEngineering and Technology Innovations
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersInstitute of Engineering Research, Seoul National UniversityMemorial University of NewfoundlandMcMaster University
KeywordsAutomationComputer scienceManufacturing engineeringEngineeringMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this work the microcontroller is programmed in MikroBasic where the pattern shape is first determined using Fast Fourier Transforms offline and then the Fourier Coefficients are embedded in the program to perform calculations online to obtain the desired pattern. The stepper motors are used for accurate manufacturing. The program shows that microcontrollers do have sufficient memory to incorporate complex programs for intricate shape production.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.053
Threshold uncertainty score0.179

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0530.022

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Control and AutomationSame topicEngineering and Technology InnovationsFrench-language works237,207