MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2124632310 · doi:10.1109/icassp.2000.861831

Waveform extraction for perfect reconstruction in WI coding

2002· article· en· W2124632310 on OpenAlexaff
V.T. Ruoppila, M. Tammi, Jukka Saarinen

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDigital Filter Design and Implementation
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWaveformAlgorithmInterpolation (computer graphics)Signal reconstructionComputer scienceQuantization (signal processing)SIGNAL (programming language)Coding (social sciences)Fourier transformSignal processingMathematicsSpeech recognitionArtificial intelligenceStatisticsTelecommunicationsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A signal model used in waveform interpolation (WI) coding assumes implicitly that the pitch period remains constant within a waveform to be extracted. This assumption is utilized for determining waveform boundaries and for forming the discrete Fourier transform (DFT) of the extracted waveform. Therefore, the waveforms do not describe the original signal faithfully during pitch changes even if an accurate pitch estimate is available for each time instant. Due to the distortions occurring in waveform extraction, the original signal cannot be recovered. In this paper, we discuss assumptions of the signal model and present a waveform extraction algorithm which provides asymptotically perfect reconstruction with vanishing quantization error. The algorithm uses cubic B-spline interpolation as the continuous approximation of the signal. The full benefit of the waveform extraction algorithm is obtained when an accurate pitch estimate is available.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDigital Filter Design and ImplementationFrench-language works237,207