MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2124701553 · doi:10.12968/jpar.2012.4.5.266

Making the transition to high quality CPR: implications for paramedic practice

2012· article· en· W2124701553 on OpenAlexaff
Nawfal Aljerian, P. Richard Verbeek, Sheldon Cheskes

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Paramedic Practice · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCardiopulmonary resuscitationCombat Medical TechnicianAmbulance serviceMedicineEmergency Care PractitionerMajor traumaResuscitationMedical emergencyIntensive care medicineEmergency medicineContinuing professional developmentProfessional development

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Out of hospital cardiac arrest remains a leading cause of mortality. Well known components of good quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) include proper chest compression rate and depth, and allowing full chest recoil. Recently, new metrics have been developed that will lead the transition from good to high quality CPR. These include hands-off time, peri-shock pause and chest compression fraction. This article discusses new findings that show how these new metrics are associated with improved survival from out of hospital cardiac arrest and how they can be implemented by paramedics performing cardiac arrest resuscitation using current and evolving defibrillator technology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.024
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.863
Threshold uncertainty score0.984

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.024
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.082
GPT teacher head0.467
Teacher spread0.385 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Paramedic PracticeSame topicCardiac Arrest and ResuscitationFrench-language works237,207