MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2124729622 · doi:10.5539/ijps.v3n2p29

The Effects of Chemotherapy on the Contrast Sensitivity Function of Breast Cancer Patients

2011· article· en· W2124729622 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Natanael Antônio dos Santos, Suellen Marinho Andrade, Haydêe Cassé da Silva

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Psychological Studies · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer-related cognitive impairment studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
KeywordsContrast (vision)Breast cancerSensitivity (control systems)PsychologyChemotherapyOncologyAudiologyCancerInternal medicineMedicineOpticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aim of this study was to determine the contrast sensitivity curves of sine-wave gratings with spatialfrequencies of women diagnosed with breast cancer compared to healthy women. The contrast threshold wasmeasured using a temporal two-alternative forced choice psychophysical method. The results showed that all ofthe participants in the experimental group displayed lower contrast sensitivity for all tested frequencies thanthose in the control group. The results suggest that the use of chemotherapy drugs can alter the visual perceptionof sinusoidal grade stimuli.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.291
Threshold uncertainty score0.188

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Psychological StudiesSame topicCancer-related cognitive impairment studiesFrench-language works237,207