MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2124740157 · doi:10.2527/jas.2011-4858

Net energy of diets containing wheat-corn distillers dried grains with solubles as determined by indirect calorimetry, comparative slaughter, and chemical composition methods1

2012· article· en· W2124740157 on OpenAlexaff
D. I. Ayoade, Elijah G. Kiarie, M. A. Trinidade Neto, C. M. Nyachoti

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAnimal Nutrition and Physiology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDistillers grainsChemistryMealAnimal scienceComposition (language)Soybean mealFood scienceFecesBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The NE content of diets containing wheat-corn distillers dried grains with solubles (wcDDGS; 1:1 ratio) fed to growing pigs was determined using the comparative slaughter (CS), indirect calorimetry (IC), and chemical composition (CH) methods. The experimental diets were a corn-soybean meal control diet (CTRL), CTRL + 15% wcDDGS, and CTRL + 30% wcDDGS. In Exp. 1, 56 barrows (18.5 kg BW) were used to determine the NE value of diets using the CS method. Pigs were initially placed in 8 groups (7/group), based on BW and 1 pig/group was killed at the start of the experiment to obtain baseline body composition. The remaining 48 pigs were housed in pairs and allotted to the 3 diets (n = 8). Pigs had free access to feed and water for a 28-d period, after which 1 pig/pen was slaughtered to determine final body composition. Based on the CS method, NE values of 2,430, 2,427, and 2,429 kcal/kg DM were obtained for diets containing 0%, 15%, and 30% wcDDGS, respectively. In Exp. 2, 18 barrows (20.4 kg BW) were used to determine the NE value of diets using the IC and CH methods. Pigs were individually housed in metabolism crates and fed the 3 diets (n = 6) at 550 kcal ME/kg BW/d for a 16-d period. Feces and urine were collected from d 11 to 16, followed by measurement of O(2) consumption, CO(2) production, and urinary N, over a 36-h period using an IC system. For the IC method, NE values of 2,586, 2,513, and 2,520 kcal/kg DM were obtained for diets containing 0%, 15%, and 30% wcDDGS, respectively, and corresponding values for the CH method were 2,447, 2,451, and 2,368 kcal/kg DM, respectively. The NE values that were obtained with the CS, IC, and CH methods were not different.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.248
Threshold uncertainty score0.243

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal ScienceSame topicAnimal Nutrition and PhysiologyFrench-language works237,207