Brain activation following peripheral administration of the GLP-1 receptor agonist exendin-4
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of our study was to investigate the anorectic and brain stimulatory effects of various doses of exendin-4 (Ex-4) and to investigate the role of the vagus nerve in Ex-4-induced brain activation. A dose-related increase in c-fos mRNA expression was observed following Ex-4 administration (0.155-15.5 μg/kg). Doses of Ex-4 that caused anorexia without aversive effects (0.155, 0.775 μg/kg) induced c-fos expression in the hypothalamic arcuate and paraventricular (PVH; parvocellular) nuclei as well as in the limbic and brainstem structures. Doses of Ex-4 that caused aversion (1.55, 15.5 μg/kg) stimulated the same regions (in a more intense way) and additionally activated the magnocellular hypothalamic structures (supraoptic nucleus and PVH magnocellular). The brain c-fos pattern induced by Ex-4 showed both similarities and differences with that induced by refeeding. Subdiaphragmatic vagotomy significantly blunted the stimulation of c-fos mRNA expression induced by Ex-4 in the nodose ganglion, the medial part of nucleus of the solitary tract, and the parvocellular division of the PVH. Pretreatment with Ex-9-39 (330 μg/kg ip) impaired the neuronal activation evoked by Ex-4 in all brain regions and in the nodose ganglion. Effects of Ex-4 on hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis activity were not altered by vagotomy. Results of this study demonstrate and relate the anorectic and brain stimulatory effects of aversive and nonaversive doses of Ex-4 and indicate that the activation of specific central regions induced by the peripheral administration of Ex-4 is, at least in part, dependent on the integrity of the vagus nerve.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".