MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2124814272 · doi:10.1007/s10350-004-0836-0

Application of Technetium-99m-Labeled Human Serum Albumin Scan to Assist Surgical Treatment of Protein-Losing Enteropathy in Cronkhite-Canada Syndrome: Report of A Case

2005· article· en· W2124814272 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kuo‐Chih Tseng, Bor‐Shyang Sheu, Jenq‐Chang Lee, Hong‐Ming Tsai, Nan-Tsing Chiu, Yuan-Chang Dai

Bibliographic record

VenueDiseases of the Colon & Rectum · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGenetic factors in colorectal cancer
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProtein losing enteropathyMedicineHypoalbuminemiaEnteropathyScintigraphyDiarrheaGastroenterologyInternal medicineTechnetiumAlbuminHypoproteinemiaSerum albuminPathologySurgeryNuclear medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cronkhite-Canada syndrome is a rare form of nonhereditary gastrointestinal polyposis associated with ectodermal change and protein-losing enteropathy. Here we report a 63-year-old male presenting with diffuse gastrointestinal polyposis, onychodystrophy, cutaneous pigmentation, alopecia, diarrhea, hypoalbuminemia and lower leg edema. Technetium-99m-labeled human serum albumin scan confirmed the patient to have protein-losing enteropathy, which originated from the transverse and descending colon. Subtotal colectomy was performed. Albumin level and ectodermal change were gradually improved during three years of outpatient clinic follow-up. Based on our finding, Technetium-99m-labeled human serum albumin scintigraphy is helpful to localize the protein-losing origins and surgery is an effective treatment for Cronkhite-Canada syndrome with protein-losing enteropathy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0040.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiseases of the Colon & RectumSame topicGenetic factors in colorectal cancerFrench-language works237,207