MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2124829768 · doi:10.1177/107484070200800202

A Developmental Model of Health and Nursing

2002· article· en· W2124829768 on OpenAlexaffabout
F. Moyra Allen, Marguerite Warner

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Family Nursing · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicFamily and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProcess (computing)NursingHealth carePhenomenonWork (physics)Plan (archaeology)PsychologyGerontologyPublic relationsSociologyMedicinePolitical scienceEpistemologyComputer scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This is the last article written by Moyra Allen prior to her death in 1996. Allen believed that nursing has a vital role to play in reorienting the Canadian health care system to goals more appropriate to our rapidly changing society—the development of healthful living styles, healthy families, and healthy communities. First, she argued, we must separate the ideas of health and illness. Health is fundamentally a social phenomenon, a way of living or behaving that is readily communicated within such institutions as the family and across groups through the media and community life. She asked: What are the resources that families/groups require to recognize and develop their potential for healthful living? How can professionals work with families in this process? In this article, she lays out an organizing plan or model with which to seek answers to these questions and the inquiry process through which the model-building process evolved.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.073

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.029
Scholarly communication0.0080.009
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.286
GPT teacher head0.425
Teacher spread0.138 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Family NursingSame topicFamily and Patient Care in Intensive Care UnitsFrench-language works237,207