MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2124847400 · doi:10.1287/opre.1060.0314

Variable Disaggregation in Network Flow Problems with Piecewise Linear Costs

2007· article· en· W2124847400 on OpenAlexaff
Keely L. Croxton, Bernard Gendron, Thomas L. Magnanti

Bibliographic record

VenueOperations Research · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicFacility Location and Emergency Management
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematical optimizationPiecewise linear functionFlow networkInteger programmingLinear programmingVariable (mathematics)Linear programming relaxationFlow (mathematics)Computer scienceRelaxation (psychology)Class (philosophy)Set (abstract data type)Envelope (radar)MathematicsFunction (biology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We study mixed-integer programming formulations, based upon variable disaggregation, for generic multicommodity network flow problems with nonconvex piecewise linear costs, a problem class that arises frequently in many application domains in telecommunications, transportation, and logistics. We present several structural results for these formulations, and we analyze the results of extensive experiments on a large set of instances with various characteristics. In particular, we show that the linear programming relaxation of an extended disaggregated model approximates the objective function by its lower convex envelope in the space of commodity flows. Together, the theoretical and computational results allow us to suggest which formulation might be the most appropriate, depending on the characteristics of the problem instances.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations79
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOperations ResearchSame topicFacility Location and Emergency ManagementFrench-language works237,207