Punching Shear Behavior of Concrete Flat Slabs in Elevated Temperature and Fire
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Two-way concrete flat slabs provide a number of benefits for office buildings, parking garages and apartments – for example, reduced formwork, prompt erection, minimal increase in story heights, and flexibility of partitions. Concrete flat slabs could be vulnerable to punching shear failure in the event of a fire. There are a limited number of studies available on concrete flat slabs for punching shear failure in fire. In the present study, a set of six reinforced concrete slabs are tested in ambient and elevated temperature to investigate their strength characteristics in punching shear failure. A model to estimate the punching shear capacity is developed and correlated with the available experimental data. Using the above model, a detailed parametric study is carried out to study the effects of various factors affecting the punching shear behavior. It is also shown that the existing code provisions for punching shear cannot predict slab behavior under fire exposure in some cases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it