MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2124870858 · doi:10.5539/ass.v5n12p87

Education and Transformation of Underachievers in Colleges and Universities

2009· article· en· W2124870858 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAsian Social Science · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and Work Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVariety (cybernetics)Quality (philosophy)Task (project management)Higher educationPsychologyPower (physics)PedagogyMathematics educationTransformation (genetics)Political scienceSociologyPublic relationsMedical educationManagementComputer scienceLawMedicineEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Education and transformation of underachievers is one of focuses and difficulties in education and management of students in higher colleges and universities. Underachievers can be classified into four types of laggard ethic thought, laggard psychological quality, laggard behavioral habits and laggard academic performance. Formation of underachievers is not only due to themselves, but also is closely related to relations with the family, school and the society. Education and transformation of underachievers is a quite complicated and painstaking task, and it is required to mobilize a variety of power from the school, family and the society and to take some comprehensive measures of helping and educating with focus, institutional guarantee, driving by precursors and psychological assistance, etc, so that optimal effects can be achieved.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.695
Threshold uncertainty score0.336

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it