La victoire du lobby gallinacé, ou les enjeux de la révolution numérique dans l’oeuvre photofictionnelle de Joan Fontcuberta
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Face à l’émergence de la culture numérique, le marché de l’image subit depuis plusieurs années une série de mutations: obsolescence de l’argentique, difficultés des services fotos de la presse écrite. Quel écho donnent les artistes, photographes ou écrivains, à cet état de crise avant tout économique du fait photographique? Assisterait-on vraiment à la mort du photographique? Cet article propose de mesurer l’impact de la révolution numérique à travers le prisme des photofictions de Joan Fontcuberta. Rejetant aussi bien les interprétations téléologiques qu’apocalyptiques de cette transition technologique, Joan Fontcuberta prend acte d’une désindexation du fait photographique, et signe une oeuvre résolument photolittéraire.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".