MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2124948356 · doi:10.4310/mrl.2009.v16.n1.a9

Uniform Bounds on Pre-Images under Quadratic Dynamical Systems

2009· article· en· W2124948356 on OpenAlexafffund
Xander Faber, Benjamin Hutz, Patrick Ingram, Rafe Jones, Michelle Manes, Thomas J. Tucker, Michael E. Zieve

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematical Research Letters · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAlgebraic Geometry and Number Theory
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAmerican Institute of Mathematics
KeywordsMathematicsCombinatoricsUpper and lower boundsDegree (music)Constant (computer programming)Orbit (dynamics)Field (mathematics)Finite setQuadratic equationDiscrete mathematicsMathematical analysisPure mathematicsGeometryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For any elements a, c of a number field K, let Γ(a, c) denote the backwards orbit of a under the map fc : C → C given by fc(x) = x 2 + c.We prove an upper bound on the number of elements of Γ(a, c) whose degree over K is at most some constant B. This bound depends only on a, [K : Q], and B, and is valid for all a outside an explicit finite set.We also show that, for any fixed N ≥ 4 and any a ∈ K outside a finite set, there are only finitely many pairs (y 0 , c) ∈ C 2 for which [K(y 0 , c) : K] < 2 N -3 and the value of the N th iterate of fc(x) at x = y 0 is a.Moreover, the bound 2 N -3 in this result is optimal.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0030.008
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.391
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMathematical Research LettersSame topicAlgebraic Geometry and Number TheoryFrench-language works237,207