MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2125000245 · doi:10.1109/nafips.2009.5156421

Application of Type-2 fuzzy estimation on uncertainty in machining: An approach on acoustic emission during turning process

2009· article· en· W2125000245 on OpenAlexaff
Qun Ren, Luc Baron, Marek Balazinski

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced machining processes and optimization
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMachiningFuzzy logicAcoustic emissionProcess (computing)Reliability (semiconductor)Filter (signal processing)Computer scienceReliability engineeringQuality (philosophy)EngineeringManufacturing engineeringAutomotive engineeringMechanical engineeringArtificial intelligenceAcoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Modern day manufactured products in high-technology industries demand ever higher precision and accuracy. The need for continuous improvements in product quality, reliability, and manufacturing efficiency has imposed strict demands on automated product measurement and evaluation on uncertainties in machining process. Type-2 fuzzy logic estimation provides the possibility to indicate the uncertainties in manufacturing process to automated process monitoring which is crucial in maintaining high quality production. This paper uses type-2 fuzzy approach to filter the raw acoustic emission (AE) signal directly from the AE sensor during a turning process and the estimation of uncertainty of AE could be of great value to a decision maker and be used to investigate tool wear condition during machining process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced machining processes and optimizationFrench-language works237,207