Relative susceptibility of five strawberry cultivars to Meloidogyne hapla under three soil water deficit levels
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The relative susceptibility of five strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa Duch.) cultivars to the root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne hapla) was tested under three different soil water deficit levels and three nematode densities. 'Bounty' was the most susceptible cultivar and 'Glooscap' the least susceptible for parasitism by M. hapla. Percent water deficit had a positive linear effect on the number of galls on strawberry roots, and on egg production and number of M. hapla larvae in the soil, regardless of cultivar type. Different population densities of the nematode had no effect on the final number of strawberry flower clusters, stolons and crowns. The initial M. hapla population had a quadratic effect on the number of galls on strawberry roots and on the number of larvae in the soil, but had a positive linear effect on M. hapla egg production. The harmfulness of this species to strawberry total yield and fruit size is questionable and requires further investigation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".