La apertura universitaria a los espacios de formación virtual: Un reto a la autonomía estudiantil
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El objetivo de este artículo es presentar los logros y problemas experimentados por un grupo de 140 estudiantes de pedagogía tras la implementación de un curso impartido por Internet. Los datos provienen del análisis (de contenido) de entrevistas efectuadas a varios estudiantes, así como de correos electrónicos recibidos (n = 1614) y de la transcripción de "conversaciones" (en línea) bajo modalidad sincrónica (chat). Los resultados suscitan nuestro interés en tanto reflejan la importancia de una gestión pedagógica rigurosa; es decir, de cursos que consideren los criterios pedagógicos en su elaboración y particularmente en relación con los cursos impartidos a través de Internet. Los resultados de este análisis facilitarán la elección de formas más eficaces de elaboración de cursos virtuales. Esperamos que lo detectado tras esta experiencia inspire a los docentes en dicha elaboración y contribuya a estimular la reflexión sobre los problemas que se deben evitar desde un punto de vista crítico.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.012 | 0.033 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".