MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2125048669 · doi:10.1002/sia.1123

Oxidation studies of Au‐Al alloys using x‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and x‐ray absorption near‐edge structure (XANES)

2001· article· en· W2125048669 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSurface and Interface Analysis · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicElectron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsXANESX-ray photoelectron spectroscopyAlloyOxideAbsorption (acoustics)Analytical Chemistry (journal)X-rayMaterials scienceMetalSpectroscopyChemistryMetallurgyChemical engineeringOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The oxidation of thin‐film Au‐ Al alloy, as well as pure Al, has been studied using XPS across a wide range of water vapour and air exposures (0.1 L to 1 × 10 14 L). The alloys and the pure Al all undergo a similar set of oxide growth kinetics. In addition to the three stages of early growth kinetics identified for Al in previous studies, a fourth stage is identified at air exposure doses of >10 9 L. During this stage, the average composition of the film changes from Al 2 O 3 to Al 2 O 3 ·H 2 O. The Al 2p lineshapes for the oxides grown on pure Al and Au‐Al alloy are different; the origins of this appear to result, in part, from a change in the Fermi level as the oxide thickens. The Al L 2,3 X‐ray absorption near‐edge structure (XANES) furthermore provides a complementary probe of the different oxide structures on alloy and Al metal. Thus, their chemical characteristics are affected also by the presence of the gold. This difference in oxide structure is detected at the interface and not through the oxide generally. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it