MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2125076267 · doi:10.1109/icpr.2006.1032

Seeing Around Occluding Objects

2006· article· en· W2125076267 on OpenAlex
Scott McCloskey, M.S. Langer, Kaleem Siddiqi

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicImage Processing Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer visionArtificial intelligencePixelComputer scienceClassification of discontinuitiesRadianceFocus (optics)Projection (relational algebra)Contrast (vision)Object (grammar)Image planeIntensity (physics)Image (mathematics)MathematicsOpticsAlgorithmPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a novel method for the removal of unwanted image intensity due to occluding objects far from the plane of focus. Such occlusions may arise in scenes with large depth discontinuities, and result in image regions where both the occluding and background objects contribute to pixel intensities. The contribution of the occluding object's radiance is modeled by reverse projection, and can be removed from this region by a simple operation on the pixel's intensity. Experimental results demonstrate our ability to accurately recover the background's appearance despite significant occlusion. As compared with processing based a linear model of occlusion, the results show lower error and a more accurate contrast

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.919
Threshold uncertainty score0.209

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it