Space-efficient evaluation of hypergeometric series
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Many important constants, such as e and Apéry's constant ζ(3), can be approximated by a truncated hypergeometric series. The evaluation of such series to high precision has traditionally been done by binary splitting followed by fixed-point division. However, the numerator and the denominator computed by binary splitting usually contain a very large common factor. In this paper, we apply standard computer algebra techniques including modular computation and rational reconstruction to overcome the shortcomings of the binary splitting method. The space complexity of our algorithm is the same as a bound on the size of the reduced numerator and denominator of the series approximation. Moreover, if the predicted bound is small, the time complexity is better than the standard binary splitting approach. Our approach allows a series to be evaluated to a higher precision without additional memory. We show that when our algorithm is applied to compute ζ(3), the memory requirement is significantly reduced compared to the binary splitting approach.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it