MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2125107958 · doi:10.1109/imtc.2008.4547144

Modeling and Measurement of Personality for E-commerce Systems

2008· article· en· W2125107958 on OpenAlexaff
Nancy Ho Woo, Shervin Shirmohammadi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicSexuality, Behavior, and Technology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPersonalizationComputer scienceProfiling (computer programming)E-commerceUser modelingWorld Wide WebPersonalityOnline advertisingHuman–computer interactionThe InternetUser interface

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In commerce, user behavior modeling is an important component of marketing and advertising. Personalization, a widely used feature of e-Commerce systems, is one aspect of such modeling. Current personalization systems require user-registration to provide their services; and personalization is determined by requiring users fill extensive forms regarding their preferences. Work done in user profiling and modeling for marketing and commerce purposes has little emphasis on user personality; moreover, there has been a growing concern for privacy of information from the ever-growing online community. In this work we propose a personality categorization model, and a measurement model for determining customer personality profiles based on their interaction with products. Personalization without registration is proposed; and integration of a privacy protocol with personalization is explored. The design, implementation and testing of a bookstore using this model is presented; furthermore the system is coupled with a privacy component to present the concept of privacy-enhanced personalization of web pages.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.681
Threshold uncertainty score0.431

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.224
GPT teacher head0.370
Teacher spread0.146 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSexuality, Behavior, and TechnologyFrench-language works237,207