Exact exchange-correlation potentials in spin-density functional theory and their discontinuities at unit electron number
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The exact exchange-correlation potential of Kohn–Sham density functional theory is known to jump discontinuously by a spatial constant as the average electron number, N, crosses an integer in an open system of fluctuating electron number, with important physical consequences for charge transfers and band gaps. We have recently constructed an essentially exact exchange-correlation potential v xc for N electrons (0 ≤ N ≤ 2) in the presence of a –1/r external potential, i.e., for a ground ensemble of H + ion, H atom, and H – ion densities. That construction illustrates the discontinuity at N = 1, where it equals I H – A H , the positive difference between the ionization energy and the electron affinity of the hydrogen atom. Here we construct the corresponding essentially exact spin-up and spin-down exchange-correlation potentials v xc,↑ and v xc,↓ of the Kohn–Sham spin-density functional theory, more commonly used for electronic structure calculations, for the ground ensemble with most-negative z-component of spin (or equivalently in the presence of a uniform magnetic field of infinitesimal strength). The potentials v xc , v xc,↑ , and v xc,↓ , which vanish as r → ∞ (except when N approaches an integer from above), are identical for 0 ≤ N ≤ 1 and for N = 2 but not for 1 < N < 2. We find that the majority or spin-down potential has a spatially constant discontinuity at N = 1 equal to I H – A H . The minority or spin-up potential has a discontinuity which is this constant in one order of limits, but is a spatially varying function in a different order of limits. This order-of-limits problem is a consequence of a special circumstance: the vanishing of the spin-up density at N = 1.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".