MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2125134821 · doi:10.7202/1024437ar

L’abbé Lionel Groulx et la crise sentinelliste

2014· article· fr· W2125134821 on OpenAlex
Damien-Claude Bélanger

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueMens Revue d histoire intellectuelle et culturelle · 2014
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Prêtre, historien et intellectuel nationaliste, l’abbé Lionel Groulx (1878-1967) avait une vision de la nation canadienne-française qui débordait largement le cadre québécois. Son œuvre, tant polémique qu’historique, témoigne d’une volonté d’inclure les Franco-Américains dans sa conception de la nation et d’appuyer leur lutte pour la survivance. Cet article examine la réaction groulxiste face à la manifestation la plus radicale de la résistance franco-américaine à l’assimilation : la crise sentinelliste. L’étude de ce conflit révèle la structuration profonde de l’idéologie groulxiste : relations intimes de la langue et de la foi en même temps que subordination de la première à la seconde, la foi jouissant de la primauté intellectuelle. Pour l’abbé, la juste cause des sentinellistes n’excuse pas leur révolte contre leur évêque, mais, en Amérique, la langue française reste le bouclier de la foi. Ce dilemme le condamne au silence pendant la crise.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.231
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it