The Analysis of 2007 APEC News Coverage on the ABC, CNN and Xinhua Websites
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This essay examines major issues of Australia, the United States and China concerned about in the 2007 APEC Summit held in Australia, and discusses the attitudes of these three countries towards to the 2007 APEC, by examining all the articles about 2007 APEC Summit from three major websites from these countries, ABC, CNN and Xinhua websites. Key words: 2007 APEC Summit; ABC; CNN; Xinhua Resume: Cet article examine les grands evenements de l'Australie, des Etats-Unis et de la Chine au Sommet de l'APEC 2007, qui s'est tenue en Australie, et examine les attitudes de ces trois pays vis-a-vis de l'APEC 2007 en examinant tous les articles sur le Sommet de l'APEC 2007 dans les trois grands sites Web de ces pays, ABC, CNN et Xinhua.Mots-cles: sommet APEC 2007; ABC; CNN; Xinhua
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".