MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2125175053 · doi:10.1785/0120120350

Regional Differences in Ground-Motion Amplitudes of Small-to-Moderate Earthquakes across North America

2013· article· en· W2125175053 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Alireza Babaie Mahani, G. M. Atkinson

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin of the Seismological Society of America · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSeismic Performance and Analysis
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCitationIconLibrary scienceDownloadHistoryGeographyComputer scienceWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Research Article| October 01, 2013 Regional Differences in Ground‐Motion Amplitudes of Small‐to‐Moderate Earthquakes across North America Alireza Babaie Mahani; Alireza Babaie Mahani University of Calgary, Department of Geoscience, ES 142, 2500 University Drive, Northwest, Calgary, Alberta, T2N 1N4 Canadaababaeim@ucalgary.cababaiemahani@gmail.com Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Gail M. Atkinson Gail M. Atkinson Western University, Department of Earth Sciences, BGS 1068, 1151 Richmond Street, North, London, Ontario, N6A 5B7 Canada Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Author and Article Information Alireza Babaie Mahani University of Calgary, Department of Geoscience, ES 142, 2500 University Drive, Northwest, Calgary, Alberta, T2N 1N4 Canadaababaeim@ucalgary.cababaiemahani@gmail.com Gail M. Atkinson Western University, Department of Earth Sciences, BGS 1068, 1151 Richmond Street, North, London, Ontario, N6A 5B7 Canada Publisher: Seismological Society of America First Online: 14 Jul 2017 Online ISSN: 1943-3573 Print ISSN: 0037-1106 Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (2013) 103 (5): 2604–2620. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120120350 Article history First Online: 14 Jul 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Search Site Citation Alireza Babaie Mahani, Gail M. Atkinson; Regional Differences in Ground‐Motion Amplitudes of Small‐to‐Moderate Earthquakes across North America. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 2013;; 103 (5): 2604–2620. doi: https://doi.org/10.1785/0120120350 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyBulletin of the Seismological Society of America Search Advanced Search Abstract We studied the response spectral amplitudes and peak ground acceleration (PGA) of earthquakes with moment magnitude (M) from 3.0 to 6.0 to investigate regional differences in ground‐motion amplitudes across North America on a nonparametric basis, for a common National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program B/C site condition (e.g., shear‐wave velocity of 760 m/s in the top 30 m of the soil column). We use southern California as the reference region because it has the most plentiful data against which to compare other regions. Amplitudes of response spectra in eastern Canada/northeastern United States become increasingly larger than those in southern California as distance, frequency, and magnitude increases. In the central United States, ground‐motion amplitudes are larger than those in southern California at distances more than 100 km (and lower at distances less than 100 km), over all frequency and magnitude ranges studied. Amplitudes for crustal events in the Pacific Northwest/British Columbia are lower than those in southern California at frequencies ≥1 Hz, over all magnitude and distance ranges (but have similar amplitudes below 1 Hz). Amplitudes in northern California are similar to those in southern California at low frequencies (below 3.3 Hz) but have lower amplitudes at high frequencies (PGA) over all distances and magnitudes. We conclude that regional amplitude differences are largely attributable to complex frequency‐dependent differences in regional attenuation. For example, the slope of apparent geometric spreading at distances less than 100 km is significantly steeper (more negative) in eastern Canada/northeastern United States than other regions and may be frequency dependent. The regional attributes of the attenuation comparisons appear to be the same for both vertical and horizontal components, at least for B/C site conditions.Online Material: Figures of region‐dependent ground‐motion amplitudes, apparent geometric spreading, statistical tests of the ground motions, and figures and table of ratios of ground motions relative to those from southern California. You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.716
Threshold uncertainty score0.687

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2013
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaSame topicSeismic Performance and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207