MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2125185745 · doi:10.1093/carcin/22.9.1473

Stimulation of DNA synthesis and c-fos mRNA expression in primary rat hepatocytes by estrogens

2001· article· en· W2125185745 on OpenAlexaff
C. H. Lee

Bibliographic record

VenueCarcinogenesis · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEstrogen and related hormone effects
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Northern British Columbia
FundersFlinders University
KeywordsDNA synthesisBiologyEpidermal growth factorHepatocyteStimulationEndocrinologyInternal medicineEstrogenMechanism of actionCell growthDNAIn vitroBiochemistryReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The mechanism(s) of tumour promotion in liver by estrogens is not well understood although growth stimulation is known to be one important element of their action. As a basis for studying mechanisms of growth control by estrogens, effects of both natural and synthetic estrogens on DNA synthesis and protooncogene c-fos mRNA expression were examined in primary cultures of normal rat hepatocytes. 17beta-Estradiol (E(2)) alone was stimulatory and exhibited dramatic synergism with epidermal growth factor (EGF) in stimulating DNA synthesis. All estrogens tested (natural, synthetic, steroidal and non-steroidal) exhibited an ability to stimulate hepatocyte DNA synthesis. This appears to correlate with their ability to induce c-fos mRNA expression. In contrast to a non-estrogenic liver tumour promoter, phenobarbital, insulin is not permissive for the growth-stimulatory action of E(2). Dexamethasone, which is required for stimulation of DNA synthesis by the non-estrogenic tumour promoter alpha-hexachlorocyclohexane and tetradecanoylphorbol acetate, completely blocked E(2)-stimulated DNA synthesis. Such differential requirements for auxiliary factors suggests that estrogen and other non-estrogenic liver tumour promoters act via distinct mechanisms in stimulating hepatocyte DNA synthesis. E(2) alone had no effect, but when in combination with EGF significantly induced c-fos mRNA expression at early times in culture (maximal at 10 h in culture). Such findings, coupled with the observations that (i) E(2) and EGF were synergistic in growth stimulation, (ii) estrogen receptor levels are higher at early times in culture and (iii) the growth-stimulatory ability of E(2) is limited to 4-24 h in culture, support the notion that in hepatocytes E(2) acts via the estrogen receptor to transactivate c-fos expression (an interaction with EGF), which ultimately culminates in enhanced DNA synthesis. Dexamethasone did not block E(2)-induced c-fos gene expression, suggesting that it acts in a pathway(s) distal to activation of fos gene expression. The possible inhibitory mechanisms of action of dexamethasone on E(2)-stimulated DNA synthesis are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.160
Threshold uncertainty score0.576

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCarcinogenesisSame topicEstrogen and related hormone effectsFrench-language works237,207