The association between RhoB and caspase-2: changes with lovastatin-induced apoptosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Because cytoskeletal actin is regulated, in part, by Rho, and because Rho and caspases are involved in apoptosis, we sought to determine whether there was an association between RhoB and caspase-2. A RhoB-caspase-2 association was consistently demonstrated in neonatal mouse cardiomyocytes with Western Blotting, either after immunoprecipitation with RhoB followed by immunoblotting with caspase-2, or in reciprocal experiments after immuno precipitation with caspase-2 and immunoblotting with RhoB (n = 14). Although the RhoB-caspase-2 complex was constitutively present, the link between RhoB and caspase-2 may be operative in apoptosis because the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor lovastatin increased the RhoB-caspase complex, especially in the nuclear fraction of the cell, with a peak occurrence 2 h after treatment. This association was unaffected by the caspase-2 inhibitor zVDVAD. Lovastatin produced apoptosis that was accompanied by an activation of caspase-2, as demonstrated by its immunohistochemistry and by the fact that the caspase-2 inhibitor zVDVAD reduced lovastatin-induced apoptosis. Lovastatin induced dramatic changes in cell morphology and a reduction in F-actin. Immunoblotting for actin suggests that lovastatin does not induce a degradation of the actin molecule, but rather affects filamentous F-actin. Caspase-2 inhibition with zVDVAD reduced lovastatin-induced alteration in cytoskeletal F-actin. The Rho inhibitor, Clostridium difficile toxin B, blunted the ability of lovastatin to induce apoptosis. In summary, these data show a previously unrecognized association between RhoB and caspase-2 in the cytosolic and nuclear fractions, which has ramifications for processes regulated by RhoB and caspase-2, including apoptosis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".