Cytogenetic Aberrations and Immunoglobulin<i>V</i><i><sub>H</sub></i>Gene Mutations in Clinically Benign CD5– Monoclonal B-Cell Lymphocytosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The finding of monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis (MBL) raises questions on the nature of clonal cell expansion and its risk of progression. We identified and characterized 7 cases of clinically benign clonal B-cell lymphocytosis. The clonal lymphocytes were clearly of CD5- and non-chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) phenotype. All cases had mild to moderate absolute lymphocytosis. The clonal population accounted for 95% to 99% of B cells. For a follow-up period of 4 to 16 years, clonal lymphocytosis was persistent but virtually not progressing. Patients' conditions remained clinically stable and asymptomatic. The clonal populations had somatic hypermutations of the VH gene in 6 cases, indicating a germinal center or post-germinal center B-lymphocyte origin. Clonal cytogenetic aberrations were found in 5 of 6 cases, with 2 clones bearing isochromosome 17q that resulted in loss of p53 and 2 other clones with 7q abnormalities. By the presence of absolute lymphocytosis, this series differs from MBL cases identified by sensitive flow cytometry in normal populations. The phenotypic profiles are distinct from that of benign CLL. We suggest these CD5-B-cell lymphocytosis cases may represent an intermediate condition between covert clonal expansions and overt malignancy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".