MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2125259249 · doi:10.1681/asn.2011111080

The Natural History of Residual Renal Function in Transplant Donors

2012· article· en· W2125259249 on OpenAlexafffund
Thomas Mueller, Valérie A. Luyckx

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Society of Nephrology · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOrgan Donation and Transplantation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsRenal functionMedicineNatural historyKidney donationUrologyKidneyProteinuriaInternal medicineKidney transplantation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

After uninephrectomy, GFR in the remaining kidney increases to 60%-70% of the predonation value, largely because of a substantial increase in renal blood flow. Donor kidney function is then generally maintained over many years. Hypertension and proteinuria are common among living donors but do not appear to negatively affect long-term renal function. Loss of reserve capacity regarding renal function in some subgroups after donation, particularly in obese and older donors, raises questions about limitations of the renal adaptive response and suggests caution in generalization of current outcome data to more marginal donors not well represented in older studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.791
Threshold uncertainty score0.187

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations64
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Society of NephrologySame topicOrgan Donation and TransplantationFrench-language works237,207