Transcription of the CTP:Phosphocholine Cytidylyltransferase α Gene Is Enhanced during the S Phase of the Cell Cycle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We have studied the transcription of the CTP:phosphocholine cytidylyltransferase alpha (CTalpha) gene in C3H10T1/2 fibroblasts as a function of the cell cycle. The cells were incubated for 48 h with 0.5% fetal bovine serum. The cells were induced into the G(1) phase of the cell cycle by the addition of medium with 10% fetal bovine serum. The cells began the synthesis of DNA after 12 h. At 16 and 20 h there was an increased amount of CTalpha mRNA that coincided with an increase in the expression of CTalpha proximal promoter-luciferase constructs (-201/+38 and -130/+38). Luciferase constructs with the basal promoter (-52/+38) showed no change in activity during the cell cycle. Incorporation of [(3)H]choline into phosphatidylcholine began to increase by 8 h after the addition of serum and peaked at 18 h. The mass of phosphatidylcholine nearly doubled between 8 and 26 h after addition of serum. CT activity increased by 6 h after serum addition and was maintained until 22 h. Thus, the increase of phosphatidylcholine biosynthesis in the G(1) phase of the cell cycle is not due to enhanced transcription of the CTalpha gene. Instead increased transcription of the CTalpha gene occurred during the S phase of the cell cycle in preparation for mitosis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".