MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2125265461 · doi:10.1095/biolreprod.109.082438

Characterization of Two Distinct Populations of Epididymosomes Collected in the Intraluminal Compartment of the Bovine Cauda Epididymis1

2010· article· en· W2125265461 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueBiology of Reproduction · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSperm and Testicular Function
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsBiologyVesicleEpididymisBiotinylationCell biologySphingomyelinSpermMotilityBiochemistryMembraneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During their transit along the epididymis, mammalian spermatozoa acquire new proteins that are necessary for their acquisition of forward motility and fertility. By using the bovine model, we previously showed that small membranous vesicles named epididymosomes are secreted in the epididymal intraluminal compartment. Epididymosomes from caput and cauda are different, and interact sequentially with the transiting spermatozoa. In fact, selected proteins of epididymosomes are transferred to different subcompartments of the maturing spermatozoa. In this study, we investigate the possibility that different subpopulations of epididymosomes are present in the caudal portion of the epididymis. Through the use of discontinuous sucrose gradient ultracentrifugation, we isolated two distinct populations that differ in their protein and lipid compositions. Although they have similar diameters, the ultrastructural appearance of these two populations was very different. The low-density (Ld) vesicles are enriched in cholesterol, sphingomyelin, and ganglioside M1, suggesting the existence of detergent-resistant membrane domains or rafts. The high-density (Hd) vesicles show a high protein concentration, including ACTB and VAMP8. When each subpopulation of biotinylated cauda epididymosomes was coincubated with caput spermatozoa, a subset of biotinylated proteins was transferred to the sperm; the Ld and Hd vesicles transferring the same pattern of proteins. In vitro competition assays of protein transferred from Ld or Hd epididymosomes to sperm confirm the similarity in the selected transferred proteins. Electrospray tandem mass spectrometry (ES-MS/MS) analysis of proteins associated with the two populations of vesicles confirm the epididymal origin of some of them, the possible involvement of others in transmembrane signaling systems, and the identification of proteins for which functions in sperm physiology remain to be determined. Mass spectrometry analysis also revealed that ELSPBP1 and GBB2 were transferred from epididymosomes to spermatozoa. Results are discussed with regard to the functions of these two cauda epididymosome populations in sperm physiology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.327
Threshold uncertainty score0.166

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it