H3 phosphorylation: dual role in mitosis and interphaseThis paper is one of a selection of papers published in this Special Issue entitled 30th Annual International Asilomar Chromatin and Chromosomes Conference and has undergone the Journal’s usual peer review process.
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Chromatin condensation and subsequent decondensation are processes required for proper execution of various cellular events. During mitosis, chromatin compaction is at its highest, whereas relaxation of chromatin is necessary for DNA replication, repair, recombination, and gene transcription. Since histone proteins are directly complexed with DNA in the form of a nucleosome, great emphasis is put on deciphering histone post-translational modifications that control the chromatin condensation state. Histone H3 phosphorylation is a mark present in mitosis, where chromatin condensation is necessary, and in transcriptional activation of genes, when chromatin needs to be decondensed. There are four characterized phospho residues within the H3 N-terminal tail during mitosis: Thr3, Ser10, Thr11, and Ser28. Interestingly, H3 phosphorylated at Ser10, Thr11, and Ser28 has been observed on genomic regions of transcriptionally active genes. Therefore, H3 phosphorylation is involved in processes requiring opposing chromatin states. The level of H3 phosphorylation is mediated by opposing actions of specific kinases and phosphatases during mitosis and gene transcription. The cellular contexts under which specific residues on H3 are phosphorylated in mitosis and interphase are known to some extent. However, the functional consequences of H3 phosphorylation are still unclear.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it