Analysis and Design of Superconducting Left-Handed Transmission Lines
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, for the first time, we study the properties of a superconductive-based left-handed transmission line (SLHTL). The effect of the kinetic inductance on the propagation constant of the left-handed transmission line is analyzed. It is shown that increasing the kinetic inductance decreases both the bragg frequency and the negative index frequency band of a distributed LHTL. A Coplanar waveguide structure is proposed to realize the LHTL. It is shown that the CPW structure has the capability of increasing the kinetic inductance of the TL by narrowing the spacing between the line and the ground plane because they are deposited on the same side of the substrate. This was not possible in a microstrip line as the spacing between the line and the ground is equal to the substrate thickness and is usually fixed. Furthermore, the dependency of the kinetic inductance to the bias current has been employed to design a tunable SLHTL. Possible applications of the tunable SLHTL in the design of miniaturized tunable resonators and filters are discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".