Feature extraction of chromosomes from 3-D confocal microscope images
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An investigation of local energy surface detection integrated with neural network techniques for image segmentation is presented, as applied in the feature extraction of chromosomes from image datasets obtained using an experimental confocal microscope. Use of the confocal microscope enables biologists to observe dividing cells (living or preserved) within a three-dimensional (3-D) volume, that can be visualised from multiple aspects, allowing for increased structural insight. The Nomarski differential interference contrast mode used for imaging translucent specimens, such as chromosomes, produces images not suitable for volume rendering. Segmentation of the chromosomes from this data is, thus, necessary. A neural network based on competitive learning, known as Kohonen's self-organizing feature map (SOFM) was used to perform segmentation, using a collection of statistics or features defining the image. Our past investigation showed that standard features such as the localized mean and variance of pixel intensities provided reasonable extraction of objects such as mitotic chromosomes, but surface detail was only moderately resolved. In this current work, a biologically inspired feature known as local energy is investigated as an alternative image statistic based on phase congruency in the image. This, along with different combinations of other image statistics, is applied in a SOFM, producing 3-D images exhibiting vast improvement in the level of detail and clearly isolating the chromosomes from the background. Index Terms-DIC, differential interference contrast, feature extraction, feature space, image segmentation, local energy, Morlet wavelet, phase congruency, self organizing feature map, SOFM.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".