MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2125302771 · doi:10.1109/nrc.1991.114742

A robust automatic censored CFAR detector for nonhomogeneous environments

2002· article· en· W2125302771 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadar Systems and Signal Processing
Canadian institutionsNew York Institute of Technology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClutterConstant false alarm rateDetectorCensoring (clinical trials)Computer scienceFalse alarmNoise (video)AlgorithmArtificial intelligenceStatisticsMathematicsPattern recognition (psychology)RadarTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A robust constant false alarm rate (CFAR) detector is proposed in which two tentative estimates of the noise level in the test cell are obtained by independently processing the outputs of the leading and the lagging range cells. These estimates are derived by employing a cell-by-cell criterion for accepting or rejecting reference samples. The final estimate of the noise level in the cell under test is set to be the maximum of the two tentative estimates. This automatic censored greatest-of (ACGO) CFAR detector exhibits robust false alarm control properties which are comparable to those of the GO-CFAR detector when the test cell and group of reference cells are in the clutter. It is also capable of censoring efficiently any unwanted interfering target returns that might appear in either the clutter or the clear region.< <ETX xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">&gt;</ETX>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.633
Threshold uncertainty score0.499

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.178
Teacher spread0.157 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRadar Systems and Signal ProcessingFrench-language works237,207