MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2125303305 · doi:10.1086/317495

Predictors of Symptom Resolution in Patients with Community‐Acquired Pneumonia

2000· article· en· W2125303305 on OpenAlexafffund
Thomas J. Marrie, Catherine Y. Lau, Susan Wheeler, Cindy J. Wong, Brian G. Feagan

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Infectious Diseases · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPneumonia and Respiratory Infections
Canadian institutionsRobarts Clinical TrialsUniversity of Alberta
FundersMedical Research CouncilUniversity of AlbertaLondon Health Sciences CentreMedical Research Council CanadaMcKnight Foundation
KeywordsMedicinePneumoniaCommunity-acquired pneumoniaIntensive care medicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Previous studies have demonstrated that a substantial number of patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) experienced CAP-related symptoms up to 3 months after the completion of antibiotic treatment. We evaluated the frequency of symptoms in a cohort of 535 patients with CAP who presented to a hospital emergency department and completed symptom questionnaires 2 and 6 weeks after the completion of a course of antibiotic therapy. Six weeks after cessation of antibiotic therapy, 64% of patients still reported > or = 1 CAP-related symptoms. Exploratory analyses were performed to identify potential predictors of complete symptom resolution. Logistic regression analysis identified younger age, absence of asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and levofloxacin treatment as predictors of complete symptom resolution (all P < .05). Randomized controlled trials should be performed to evaluate the relative efficacy of different antibiotic therapies on the rate of resolution of symptoms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.521

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations52
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Infectious DiseasesSame topicPneumonia and Respiratory InfectionsFrench-language works237,207