MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2125361963 · doi:10.1109/igarss.2007.4423206

Hybrid change detection for watershed impervious surface using multi-time remotely sensed data

2007· article· en· W2125361963 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Xuemei Ma, Liang Chen

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicLand Use and Ecosystem Services
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Calgary
KeywordsChange detectionImpervious surfaceWatershedRemote sensingComputer scienceDecision treeRandom forestData miningEnvironmental scienceArtificial intelligenceGeologyMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, an approach to quantify basin impervious surfaces as an input variable for hydrological model was proposed, in which a hybrid change detection method and decision tree classifier based on data mining algorithm was employed using multi-temporal Landsat TM/ETM images in 1988, 1994 and 2002 at the same season in the lower reach of Yangtze River. The change types for 1994–2002 and 1988–1994 were extracted and validated with overlay analysis of GIS. The experimental results were shown that the overall classification accuracy is 88.1% compared with 69.3% of MLC in 2002 for six watershed types, and detection accuracy for five change types was 89.1% and 91.4% respectively for 1994–2002 and 1988–1994. It is demonstrated that the proposed approach is of capability for the change detecting, and can be achieved better accuracy at 30m resolution for distributed hydrological models with multi-temporal data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicLand Use and Ecosystem ServicesFrench-language works237,207