MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2125371903

THE FALSE EXPECTATIONS OF MICHAEL PORTER’S STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK

2008· article· en· W2125371903 on OpenAlexaff
Omar Aktouf

Bibliographic record

VenueRepositorio Institucional E-DocUR (Universidad Del Rosario) · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGlobal and Cross-Cultural Management
Canadian institutionsHEC Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOperationalizationOrder (exchange)Competitive advantageEpistemologyStrategic managementPoint (geometry)Resource (disambiguation)ManagementComputer scienceSociologyManagement scienceKnowledge managementBusinessEconomicsPhilosophyMathematics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

El artículo busca demostrar las inconsistencias del pensamiento estratégico de Porter desde el punto de vista metodológico y epistemológico. De igual manera, muestra que las propuestas praxológicas de Porter son imposibles de operacionalizar y normativizar. Además, la teoría carece de factores fundamentales que permitan a las organizaciones perdurar y ser exitosas en el tiempo teniendo ventaja defendible y difícilmente imitable.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.021
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.023
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.112

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0210.023
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.036
Scholarly communication0.0120.013
Open science0.0020.006
Research integrity0.0050.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRepositorio Institucional E-DocUR (Universidad Del Rosario)Same topicGlobal and Cross-Cultural ManagementFrench-language works237,207