MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2125372030 · doi:10.1109/crv.2009.37

A Generic Moment Invariants Based Supervised Learning Framework for Classification Using Partial Object Information

2009· article· en· W2125372030 on OpenAlexaff
Rashid Minhas, Abdul Adeel Mohammed, Q. M. Jonathan Wu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage Retrieval and Classification Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtificial intelligenceRobustness (evolution)Pattern recognition (psychology)Invariant (physics)AdaBoostCognitive neuroscience of visual object recognitionMoment (physics)Object detectionComputer scienceClassifier (UML)Contextual image classificationComputer visionTranslation (biology)MathematicsFeature extractionImage (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a novel classification scheme which uses partial object information that is selected adaptively using modified distance transform and represented as moment invariants (Hu moments) to compensate for scale, translation and rotational transformation(s). The moment invariants of different parts of an object are learned using AdaBoost algorithm [1]. The classifier obtained using the proposed scheme is able to handle changes in illumination, pose, and varying inter-class and intra-class attributes. Partial information based classification shows robustness against object articulations, clutters, and occlusions. The first contribution of our proposed method is an adaptive selection of partial object information using modified distance transform that attempts to extract contours along with its neighborhood information in the form of blocks. Secondly, our proposed method is invariant to scaling, translation and rotation, and reliably classifies occluded objects using fractional information. Our proposed method achieved better detection and classification rate compared to other state-of-the-art schemes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.923
Threshold uncertainty score0.453

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicImage Retrieval and Classification TechniquesFrench-language works237,207