MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2125384193 · doi:10.1109/cdc.2007.4434241

Games with coupled propagated constraints in optical networks: The multi-link case

2007· article· en· W2125384193 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Optical Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConvexityComputer scienceExploitLink (geometry)Nash equilibriumExtension (predicate logic)Optical linkMathematical optimizationNetwork topologyTopology (electrical circuits)MathematicsOptical fiberComputer networkTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work extends previous results on games with coupled constraints in optical links to general multi-link topologies. Nash equilibria of such games can be computed based on recent extension of duality to a game theoretical framework. Unlike capacity constraints in flow control, coupled constraints in optical networks are propagated along links. This introduces additional complications for analysis. Specifically, convexity of the propagated constraints is no longer automatically ensured. We show that convexity is satisfied for the special case of multi-links with a single sink. The general case of multi-links with arbitrary sources and sinks is dealt with by a partitioned (modified) game with stages. We exploit the single sink structure of each stage and the ladder-nested form of the game.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.662
Threshold uncertainty score0.430

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Optical Network TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207