MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2125384537

Structure of the South-Eastern Nechako Basin, British Columbia: Results of Seismic Interpretation and First-Arrival Tomographic Inversion

2008· article· en· W2125384537 on OpenAlexaffabout
N Hayward, Andrew J. Calvert

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyTranstensionNeogenePaleontologyForeland basinInversion (geology)VolcanoVolcanic rockStructural basinSedimentary rockCretaceousSeismologyTranspressionTectonicsSedimentary basinRiftShear zone
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary Reinterpretation of Canadian Hunter seismic reflection profiles provides new insight into the complex structure, stratigraphy and tectonic history of the south-eastern Nechako Basin. The basin, which contains predominantly Mesozoic sedimentary and volcanic rocks, is overlain by Eocene and Neogene volcanic rocks and Pleistocene glacial deposits that mask the underlying geology. New results reveal details of how Cretaceous sedimentary and volcanic rocks, deformed during preEocene transpression, were re-activated and cut by NW-SE trending strike-slip faults related to Eocene transtension. First-arrival tomographic models provide new information on the structure and velocity of the near-surface volcanic rocks. The focussing of model rays allows for estimation of the thickness of the Endako Group in the vicinity of well b-82-C, and may elsewhere provide information on the thickness of the Neogene and Eocene volcanic rocks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.045

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.148
Teacher spread0.143 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological and Geochemical Analysis→French-language works237,207→