MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2125416618 · doi:10.2202/1948-4682.1189

September 11, 2001: Ten Years Later

2011· article· en· W2125416618 on OpenAlex
David GC McCann, Heidi P. Cordi

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld Medical & Health Policy · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicDisaster Response and Management
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTerrorismPreparednessScope (computer science)Political scienceCriminologyLawSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract World perceptions of security and health threats have changed in the last decade. The terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 ushered communities into a new paradigm of social construct and behavior. In the United States (U.S.) the heightened security measures, surveillance, and medical preparedness of the Patriot Act have had far reaching effects on various sectors of our society. Fortunately, there has not been a successful attack on U.S. soil since 9‐11, but our allies in the “war on terror” have not been so fortunate (e.g. London, Madrid, Mumbai and Oslo bombings). Changes in the scope of civilian and military involvement and an expanding medical role are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.360
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0270.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.117
GPT teacher head0.487
Teacher spread0.370 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it