MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2125444336 · doi:10.1002/aic.12605

Development of a simultaneous continuum and noncontinuum state estimator with application on a distillation process

2011· article· en· W2125444336 on OpenAlexaff
Moshood J. Olanrewaju, Biao Huang, Artin Afacan

Bibliographic record

VenueAIChE Journal · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Control Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEstimatorProcess (computing)DistillationApplied mathematicsState estimatorProcess developmentMathematicsStatistical physicsProcess engineeringState (computer science)Calculus (dental)Computer sciencePhysicsAlgorithmChemistryEngineeringStatisticsChromatography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This study focuses on the development and application of a hybrid moving horizon estimator (HMHE) to achieve simultaneous estimation of both continuum and noncontinuum states in a constrained switching dynamic system. One of the major issues in a moving horizon estimation approach is the development of an arrival cost to summarize the effect of past and a prior information. In this work, we have developed a generalized arrival cost, which accounts for both continuum and noncontinuum states. A generalized hybrid state estimator, which can be used as a stand‐alone continuum state estimator, or as a simultaneous continuum and noncontinuum state estimator, is developed. The effects of constraints, process, and measurement noise levels, as well as a moving horizon length on the simultaneous estimation of both the continuum and noncontinuum states are analyzed. The effectiveness of the HMHE is demonstrated through simulation studies, while its practical reliability is tested by conducting experimental studies on a distillation column. © 2011 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J, 2012

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.480
Threshold uncertainty score0.347

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAIChE JournalSame topicAdvanced Control Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207