MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2125460212 · doi:10.1109/icip.2000.899568

The iterative deconvolution of linearly blurred images using non-parametric stabilizing functions

2002· article· en· W2125460212 on OpenAlex
JS Hare, J.P. Reilly

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Image Processing Techniques
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDeconvolutionRegularization (linguistics)Iterative methodParametric statisticsBlind deconvolutionPropagation of uncertaintyNoise (video)AlgorithmImage restorationComputer scienceMathematicsMathematical optimizationImage (mathematics)Image processingArtificial intelligenceStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An iterative solution to the problem of image deconvolution is presented. The previous image estimate is pre-filtered using a stabilizing function that is updated based on current error and noise estimates. Noise propagation from one iteration to the next is reduced by the use of a second, regularizing operator resulting in a hybrid iteration technique. Further, error terms are developed that shed new light on the error propagation properties of this method by quantifying the extent of noise and regularization error propagation. Optimal non-parametric stabilizing and regularization functions are then derived based on this error analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.931
Threshold uncertainty score0.325

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Image Processing TechniquesFrench-language works237,207