MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2125502424 · doi:10.3324/haematol.2012.083063

Combined antifungal approach for the treatment of invasive mucormycosis in patients with hematologic diseases: a report from the SEIFEM and FUNGISCOPE registries

2013· letter· en· W2125502424 on OpenAlexafffund
Livio Pagano, Oliver A. Cornely, Alessandro Busca, Michele Caira, Simone Cesaro, Cristiana Gasbarrino, Corrado Girmenia, Werner Heinz, Raoul Herbrecht, Cornelia Lass‐Flörl, Annamaria Nosari, Leonardo Potenza, Volker Rickerts, Donald C. Sheppard, Arne Simon, Andrew J. Ullmann, Caterina Giovanna Valentini, Jörg Janne Vehreschild, Anna Candoni, Maria J. G. T. Vehreschild

Bibliographic record

VenueHaematologica · 2013
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAntifungal resistance and susceptibility
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersMerck Sharp and DohmeRobert Koch InstitutMasarykova UniverzitaUniversität zu KölnJulius-Maximilians-Universität WürzburgCelgeneUniversität des SaarlandesAstellas PharmaUniversitätsklinikum KölnBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungPfizer PharmaceuticalsMcGill UniversityDeutsches Zentrum für InfektionsforschungBioCrystCentral European Institute of TechnologyGilead SciencesPfizerViropharmaKoch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
KeywordsMucormycosisAntifungalAmphotericin BMedicineInternal medicineHematologic NeoplasmsHematopoietic stem cell transplantationLeukemiaIntensive care medicineTransplantationSurgeryDermatology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Combined antifungal approach for the treatment of invasive mucormycosis in patients with hematologic diseases: a report from the SEIFEM and FUNGISCOPE registries

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations122
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHaematologicaSame topicAntifungal resistance and susceptibilityFrench-language works237,207