MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2125521982 · doi:10.1109/icme.2011.6012253

Fusion of face networks through the surveillance of public spaces to address sociological security recommendations

2011· article· en· W2125521982 on OpenAlexaff
SK Alamgir Hossain, A. Rahman, Abdulmotaleb El Saddik

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVideo Surveillance and Tracking Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFace (sociological concept)Port (circuit theory)Computer scienceComputer securitySpace (punctuation)Key (lock)Aggregate (composite)Corporate governancePublic spaceSociologyBusinessEngineeringSocial science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Researchers around the world are trying to address the ever increasing security requirements by bringing new approaches to surveillance specifically in public places like school, rail way, subway station, air port etc. To establish and sustain security in public spaces, surveillance plays a key role in technology-dependent governance common to many countries in the world. Traditionally, through the routine surveillance, an automated security system gains knowledge about people and their activities in a certain space. In this paper we are proposing a fusion algorithm to aggregate surveillance parameters from more than one such spaces. Inspired by existing works on social network analysis based on human photos, we propose a new face network structure model. These face network structures are later fused to obtain sociological parameters of a person of interest and gather recommendations about the circle of associates of that individual. We believe these type of recommendations are helpful in comprehensive investigation purposes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.893
Threshold uncertainty score0.272

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.134
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicVideo Surveillance and Tracking MethodsFrench-language works237,207