Optimal hydrogen production in a stand-alone renewable energy system
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A stand-alone renewable wind-photovoltaic energy system can be used to meet the energy requirements of off-grid remote area applications. Such a system has been developed and successfully tested at the Hydrogen Research Institute (HRI). In the HRFs system the excess electrical energy with respect to load demand, is transformed and stored as hydrogen gas via an electrolyzer. The stored hydrogen represents a long-term ecological and transportable form of energy. The renewable energy (RE) system components have substantially different voltage-current characteristics and their operation must be well understood and coordinated to allow an optimal power management in the system. Wind turbine generator, DC-DC buck converter and electrolyzer play key roles in the hydrogen production process. Accurate knowing of operating characteristics of these components is necessary to develop an effective power flow control for the hydrogen production. This paper investigates operational characteristics of the wind turbine, the electrolyzer and the buck converter in order to develop an energy management strategy that will increase the hydrogen production efficiency in the RE system. Wind turbine model is developed and simulation results are compared with experimental measurements. The electrolyzer is characterized and its optimal operating range is defined. The multiphase control principle of the designed buck converter is presented and the efficiency curve is provided. An energy management strategy is proposed to increase the overall efficiency of the hydrogen production process.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".